All in All

…it’s just another brick in the wall.

If it was my son, I would be willing to give up every swinging dick in Guantanamo to get him back. I get that part. But it’s not. And now the enemy knows what we will pay for a live American soldier. We will pay five for one. And we will negotiate.

1. Mohammad Fazl

One of the first detainees captured in Afghanistan to be transferred to Guantanamo — in January 2002 — Fazl is the Taliban’s former deputy minister of defense. He was one of the Taliban’s founding members, rising through the ranks to become Taliban Chief of Army Staff when it ruled Afghanistan. Human Rights Watch accuses Fazl of presiding over the mass killings of Afghanistan’s Shi’ite Muslims in 2000 and 2001.

2. Mohammad Nabi

The former chief of Taliban security in Qalat, the capital of Afghanistan’s southern Zabul Province.

3. Abdul Haq Wasiq

Also accused by Human Rights Watch of mass killings and torture during the Taliban’s time in power, the Taliban’s former deputy minister of intelligence is considered to have been at one time one of Mullah Omar’s closest confidants.

4. Mullah Norullah Nori

Nori was the senior Taliban commander in the strategic northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif. He is considered to be one of the most high-ranking Taliban officials ever to be held in Guantanamo. He is also accused of being involved in the massacre of thousands Shi’ite Muslims in 2000 and 2001.

5. Khairullah Khairkhwa

The former Taliban governor of Heart Province, which borders Iran, Khairkhwa has also served as a military commander and a minister of the interior.

The New Normal

This happened in a VA hospital. As the government gets more involved in everyone’s health care, does anyone think it’s even going to be as good as the VA? When the government is paying for our care, we are not customers in a business relationship with a doctor. The government is the customer, in a business relationship with the doctor, and we are the product.

Moving An Inch

Carteach0 put up a post where he asked the question, “How far (in thousandths of an inch) must the muzzle deflect to change the point of impact 1moa at 100 yards?” I answered in text in his comments, but it seemed like such an interesting question I wanted to explore it here.

He was considering the full length of the rifle, but I think you could consider the problem from the rear sight forward, as it would be the same whether there is a stock mounted on the rifle or not. On most rifles the rear sight sits over the chamber, the front sight is close to the muzzle. To eliminate all other variables, assume no wind and that perfect ammo is being used, so that if the rifle doesn’t move, every round would impact the same hole. With that, here goes my thoughts on the topic.

Imagine a line that begins at the center of the rear sight, passes over the tip of the front sight, and impacts the target in the center. How much does the front sight move to move the impact point one inch? In my calculation, I assumed my rifle had a sight radius of 16 inches. I used this on-line calculator to solve the angles. Essentially you are solving for a long skinny triangle. Two sides are 3600 inches, the third side is one inch. That makes the small angle 0.0159 degrees. A movement of 0.0159 degrees moves the bullet impact 1 inch. If your sight radius is 16 inches, that means your front sight has to move 0.0044 inches to move the bullet impact 1 inch.

It puts the whole “sight picture / sight alignment” issue in a new light.